<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mootools vs Script.aculo.us</title>
	<link>http://team.bkwld.com/2008/03/08/mootools-vs-scriptaculous/</link>
	<description>Team BKWLD</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: hayden</title>
		<link>http://team.bkwld.com/2008/03/08/mootools-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-3225</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 03:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://team.bkwld.com/2008/03/08/mootools-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-3225</guid>
					<description>MooTools isn't THAT hard to figure out and is by far a better well built set of tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MooTools isn&#8217;t THAT hard to figure out and is by far a better well built set of tools.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben</title>
		<link>http://team.bkwld.com/2008/03/08/mootools-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-2084</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://team.bkwld.com/2008/03/08/mootools-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-2084</guid>
					<description>Don't forget the mootorial:

http://clientside.cnet.com/wiki/mootorial

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget the mootorial:</p>
<p><a href="http://clientside.cnet.com/wiki/mootorial" rel="nofollow">http://clientside.cnet.com/wiki/mootorial</a></p>
<p>:)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben</title>
		<link>http://team.bkwld.com/2008/03/08/mootools-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-2083</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://team.bkwld.com/2008/03/08/mootools-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-2083</guid>
					<description>Those demos have a link to "doc references" which opens a list of links to the documentation, showing all the relevant docs for that demo. You can also see the .js source, .html markup and .css for that specific demo. That's what I like about Moo's docs is the friendly usage demo page.

For example, the Chain demo uses a delay at one point and that is listed in the docs:

6. Native/Function.js#Function.delay

Guess it's really just a matter of preference. I think Koa might even throw JQuery into the mix as better than both to be honest. You have a lot of great options, that's for sure :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those demos have a link to &#8220;doc references&#8221; which opens a list of links to the documentation, showing all the relevant docs for that demo. You can also see the .js source, .html markup and .css for that specific demo. That&#8217;s what I like about Moo&#8217;s docs is the friendly usage demo page.</p>
<p>For example, the Chain demo uses a delay at one point and that is listed in the docs:</p>
<p>6. Native/Function.js#Function.delay</p>
<p>Guess it&#8217;s really just a matter of preference. I think Koa might even throw JQuery into the mix as better than both to be honest. You have a lot of great options, that&#8217;s for sure :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert</title>
		<link>http://team.bkwld.com/2008/03/08/mootools-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-2078</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://team.bkwld.com/2008/03/08/mootools-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-2078</guid>
					<description>Moo's documentation looks nice, but actually figuring out how to use it's methods is no where near as straightforward as prototypes and scripts.  At least that's how it reads to me.  For instance, I've never heard of chaining (that demo was tight) and when I went to find where that exists in the docs, I couldn't find it.  Maybe it's a personal thing, but I spend may more time pecking through mootools to find stuff.

The "nearly identical" though means that I can't just count on everything that's in prototype being in it.  For instance, they fire way less events for ajax requests.  And compare how they talk about identical fundamental things:

http://docs.mootools.net/Native/Element.js#$

vs

http://www.prototypejs.org/api/utility/dollar

Prototype holds my hand and walks me through it :)

Mootools package creation is the shit and was why I was pumped to try it in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moo&#8217;s documentation looks nice, but actually figuring out how to use it&#8217;s methods is no where near as straightforward as prototypes and scripts.  At least that&#8217;s how it reads to me.  For instance, I&#8217;ve never heard of chaining (that demo was tight) and when I went to find where that exists in the docs, I couldn&#8217;t find it.  Maybe it&#8217;s a personal thing, but I spend may more time pecking through mootools to find stuff.</p>
<p>The &#8220;nearly identical&#8221; though means that I can&#8217;t just count on everything that&#8217;s in prototype being in it.  For instance, they fire way less events for ajax requests.  And compare how they talk about identical fundamental things:</p>
<p><a href="http://docs.mootools.net/Native/Element.js#$" rel="nofollow">http://docs.mootools.net/Native/Element.js#$</a></p>
<p>vs</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prototypejs.org/api/utility/dollar" rel="nofollow">http://www.prototypejs.org/api/utility/dollar</a></p>
<p>Prototype holds my hand and walks me through it :)</p>
<p>Mootools package creation is the shit and was why I was pumped to try it in the first place.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben</title>
		<link>http://team.bkwld.com/2008/03/08/mootools-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-2070</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 18:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://team.bkwld.com/2008/03/08/mootools-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-2070</guid>
					<description>Personally, "moo" pwns "lous". And their implementation of prototype is nearly identical ("Some functions are inspired by those found in prototype.js http://prototype.conio.net/ © 2005 Sam Stephenson sam [at] conio [dot] net, MIT-style license"). Not sure what you mean about documentation...moo's is sick:

http://docs.mootools.net/Effects/Fx-Transitions.js

Also, does scriptaculous have chaining? I don't remember it.

http://demos.mootools.net/Chain

Also:

http://docs.mootools.net/Native/Function.js#Function.delay

With their site design and the package creation (where you can select which functionality you want and have it compressed)...Moo, ftw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, &#8220;moo&#8221; pwns &#8220;lous&#8221;. And their implementation of prototype is nearly identical (&#8221;Some functions are inspired by those found in prototype.js <a href="http://prototype.conio.net/" rel="nofollow">http://prototype.conio.net/</a> © 2005 Sam Stephenson sam [at] conio [dot] net, MIT-style license&#8221;). Not sure what you mean about documentation&#8230;moo&#8217;s is sick:</p>
<p><a href="http://docs.mootools.net/Effects/Fx-Transitions.js" rel="nofollow">http://docs.mootools.net/Effects/Fx-Transitions.js</a></p>
<p>Also, does scriptaculous have chaining? I don&#8217;t remember it.</p>
<p><a href="http://demos.mootools.net/Chain" rel="nofollow">http://demos.mootools.net/Chain</a></p>
<p>Also:</p>
<p><a href="http://docs.mootools.net/Native/Function.js#Function.delay" rel="nofollow">http://docs.mootools.net/Native/Function.js#Function.delay</a></p>
<p>With their site design and the package creation (where you can select which functionality you want and have it compressed)&#8230;Moo, ftw.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
