<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HELVETICA</title>
	<link>http://team.bkwld.com/2008/04/04/helvetica/</link>
	<description>Team BKWLD</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Vicki</title>
		<link>http://team.bkwld.com/2008/04/04/helvetica/#comment-2391</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://team.bkwld.com/2008/04/04/helvetica/#comment-2391</guid>
					<description>i agree w/ jeff that it's difficult to choose one movement over another - the best thing about modern design is that more than ever, people are willing to make new rules to better execute the message/campaign. what makes helvetica so amazing is of course, it's composition, balance, and neutrality - but on the flipside, you have people like carson who are trying to forge something different and make people look at something as typical as typography in a completely new way. part of carson's uniqueness and the reason i admire him is his ability to take the neutral and totally destroy it / make it into something very evocative by deconstructing its basic components. it's almost like a throwback to the arts &#38; crafts movement. how do we make something look handmade, or individualistic, full of expression and meaning, in a completely sterilized digital world?

personally i think the challenge today isn't making something new or following the set path, but finding an aesthetically pleasing balance between art &#38; functionality. what i love over anything else is a design that is unexpected, not necessarily new or classic - just something that works, but surprises me. a good design doesn't have to break the rules or forge new ones, it's all about bending and shifting. people are really jaded and i think it's our job as designers to renew people's faith in the medium of visual communication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree w/ jeff that it&#8217;s difficult to choose one movement over another - the best thing about modern design is that more than ever, people are willing to make new rules to better execute the message/campaign. what makes helvetica so amazing is of course, it&#8217;s composition, balance, and neutrality - but on the flipside, you have people like carson who are trying to forge something different and make people look at something as typical as typography in a completely new way. part of carson&#8217;s uniqueness and the reason i admire him is his ability to take the neutral and totally destroy it / make it into something very evocative by deconstructing its basic components. it&#8217;s almost like a throwback to the arts &amp; crafts movement. how do we make something look handmade, or individualistic, full of expression and meaning, in a completely sterilized digital world?</p>
<p>personally i think the challenge today isn&#8217;t making something new or following the set path, but finding an aesthetically pleasing balance between art &amp; functionality. what i love over anything else is a design that is unexpected, not necessarily new or classic - just something that works, but surprises me. a good design doesn&#8217;t have to break the rules or forge new ones, it&#8217;s all about bending and shifting. people are really jaded and i think it&#8217;s our job as designers to renew people&#8217;s faith in the medium of visual communication.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
